Skip to main content
Pathology Update 2025
Times are shown in your local time zone GMT

How do pathologists in Asia perceive interactions with patients? A questionnaire study on attitudes and barriers to patient-pathologist consultations (PPCs)

Roche Scientific E Poster Display

Roche Scientific E-Poster Display

Discipline Streams

Anatomical Pathology

ePoster

100% Page:   /  

Abstracts/Presentation Description

Lavisha S Punjabi1, Sanmitha Nedunchezian2, Levina Ang Ying Xin3 , Bryan Song Jun Yong3
1Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
2Department of General Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore
3Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
 
In recent years, patient-pathologist consultations(PPCs), where patients discuss their results with a pathologist, have gained traction in Western countries1. To the best of our knowledge, perceptions towards PPCs among pathologists in Asia is hitherto unknown; hence, the aim of our study was to gauge interest towards PPCs, including perceived benefits, challenges and barriers.
 
An electronic questionnaire comprising 10 multiple-choice-questions was distributed via email and social media platforms over 4 months. Pathologists and trainees in Asia were invited to participate, anonymously and voluntarily. 
 
71 responses were received across 12 countries. More than half felt that pathologists should not directly engage with patients(61%), and were not interested in PPCs(58%). Reasons cited were challenges with patient communication(49%) and lack of occupational bandwidth(49%). Perceived benefits of PPCs were closer collaboration with other healthcare team members(77%) and broadening skill sets(66%), while perceived challenges were increased workload(73%) and medico-legal issues(59%). Barriers to PPCs cited included lack of workplace readiness(69%) and lack of remuneration(48%).
 
The results allude to lower interest towards PPCs among pathologists in Asia, compared to Western populations2. This raises the question of how institutions may mitigate barriers towards PPCs, and emphasizes the importance of doing so, prior to introducing a service valued by patients3
 
References:
1.  Booth AL, Katz MS, Misialek MJ, Allen TC, Joseph L. “Please help me see the dragon I am slaying”: implementation of a novel patient-pathologist consultation program and survey of patient experience. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2019 Jul 1;143(7):852-8.
2. Lapedis CJ, Kroll-Wheeler L, DeJonckheere M, Johnston D, Owens SR. Broadening the scope: a qualitative study of pathologists’ attitudes toward patient-pathologist interactions. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2021 Dec 1;156(6):969-79.
3. Jug R, Booth AL, Buckley AF, Newell J, Kesterson J, Gardner JM, Ozcan L, Liu B, Green CL, Joseph L, Cummings TJ. Multisite quality improvement study of a patient-pathologist consultation program. American journal of clinical pathology. 2021 Jun 1;155(6):887-94.

Statement of originality and contributions: LSP (senior author) – conceptualisation, literature review, questionnaire dissemination, data analysis, abstract drafting, poster editing

Speaker/Presenting Authors

Authors

Submitting/Presenting Authors

Dr Lavisha S Punjabi - Singapore General Hospital (Singapore, Singapore)

Resources